Sunday, 27 September 2009

Six Month Hiatus


Today 27.09.09 marks exactly six months some 120 days since my last posting.
Today 27.09.09 marks the end of the nine nights of prayers refered to as NAVARATRI.
I stopped blogging and commenting this april as I was weary of the garbage that was spuing in cyberspace.
I was weary of persons being denigrated in cyberspace simply because said persons posted a personal take/intepretation of certain events.
I was weary of persons/people in power spewing all manner of lies & distotations.
I was weary of the seemingly down slide in our collective consciousness & the total abandonment of any manner & form of Our Civil Society/Mashyrakat Maadani.
It was so bad that I believed that I would shut down forever UNTIL a tsunami hit our lives on 10.09.09.
I will be giving details of this tsunami later, suffice to with much horror I came to realize that our Bumi is is this state due to recless abandonment we have gone into cyberspace.
With the start of Navaratri {Friday Last}, I began o rethink my stance & have decided to come back into CYBERSPACE.
CHEERS!
posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Monday, 27 April 2009

Fwd: [Lawyers Talk:1449] OVERCOMING MONDAY BLUES......

From: Uma Thothathri
Sent: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:15 pm
Subject: OVERCOMING MONDAY BLUES......




A little humor with good moral.

The Pastor's Ass



The pastor entered his donkey in a race and
it won.

The pastor was so pleased with the donkey
that he entered it in the Race
again, and it won again.


The local paper read:



PASTOR'S ASS OUT FRONT.


The Bishop was so upset with this kind of
publicity that he ordered the pastor not to enter the donkey in another race.


The next day, the local paper headline read:





BISHOP SCRATCHES PASTOR'S ASS.


This was too much for the bishop, so he ordered the pastor to get rid of the donkey.


The pastor decided to give it to a nun in a nearby convent.

The local paper, hearing of the news, posted the following headline the next day:



NUN HAS BEST ASS IN TOWN.


The bishop fainted.

He informed the nun that she would have to get rid of the donkey, so she
sold it to a farmer for $10.


The next day the paper read:


NUN SELLS ASS FOR $10.


This was too much for the bishop, so he ordered the nun to buy back the
donkey and lead it to the plains where it could run wild.

The next day the headlines read:


NUN ANNOUNCES HER ASS IS WILD AND FREE.


The bishop was buried the next day.


The moral of the story is .. . .. being concerned about public opinion can
bring you much grief and misery . even shorten your
life..


So be yourself and enjoy life.


Stop worrying about everyone else's ass and
you'll be a lot happier and live longer!


Have a nice day!



--
Siti Z Kasim
Homini plurima ex homine sunt mala
Man is the root of almost all man's problems


Sunday, 19 April 2009

And The Truth/s is/are:

I have extracted the substance of the posting by Hanipha Maidin as it appeared on the MT site:

The truth is that out of 10 court orders sought by Zambry and his six exco members,
only two orders were granted by the Federal Court.

I dare to say that these two orders are ineffective and inconsequential in nature.

They are not, in any manner, capable of reining in the speaker’s power.

They merely declared that V. Sivakumar’s decisions on Feb 18, 2009 was null and void.

I strongly believe that these orders will be met by the following response by Sivakumar: “So what”?

The truth is that the Federal Court did not grant the other eight orders prayed for by Zambry and his six exco members in their summons against Sivakumar.
These eight orders have been hidden from the public knowledge.

The truth is that,

1} despite the fact the court invalidated the decision of Sivakumar in suspending Zambry and his six exco members from attending the Assembly for a period of 18 months and 12 months, respectively,
the Federal Court also at one fell swoop
refused to grant a declaratory order allowing Zambry and the six exco members to attend and participate in all of the proceedings in the Assembly.

Without this crucial court’s order,
one fails to understand the basis on which Zambry’s lawyers have formed an opinion that
Zambry et al could enter the Assembly without any legal impediments blocking their entry.

The truth is that

2} Umno miserably failed to state that
the Federal Court also declined to grant an order declaring that the act of Sivakumar in suspending and prohibiting Zambry and his six exco members from attending the Assembly was contrary to law.

The truth is that

3} the Federal Court rejected a declaratory relief which says that the Perak State Assembly was not bound by Sivakumar’s decision in suspending Zambry and his six exco members.

The truth is that,

4} by not granting all the 10 orders sought by Zambry et al, the Federal Court implicitly acknowledged the doctrine of trias politica (the French term for separation of powers) that is the Speaker is still the final arbiter as far as the internal affairs of the State Legislative Assembly are concerned.

Whatever grouse we may have against the Federal Court judges, the fact that

5} only two inconsequential orders were granted by the court demonstrates that the court still exercised “judicial self-restrain” in questioning any decision of the another branch of the government’s arms i.e the legislative body.

In the circumstances,
6} the court deserves a bit of respect for at least exhibiting judicial minimalism when confronted with the issue of questioning the speaker’s powers.

The decision would, of course, be for the court to follow, thus creating certainty, the stare decisis (the past judicial precedents).

There are at least five judgments of the Malaysian courts, given by judges of impeccable integrity, which in unison held that any decision by the speaker or legislative body would not be amenable to judicial intervention.

The truth is that,

7} notwithstanding Umno’s attempts to have the sitting under the tree declared invalid by the court, this too was also not entertained by the latter.

Thus no declaration has been made to date by the court that such a sitting was invalid. It follows therefore
8} that the sitting was valid until proven otherwise.

The truth is that
9} Nizar’s suit against Zambry has nothing to do with Zambry’s suit against Sivakumar. The two suits are poles apart.
Thus a suggestion by Umno’s lawyer, Datuk Hafarizam, that Nizar should consider withdrawing his suit against Zambry, was clearly a preposterous proposition unsupported by any legal foundation.

Lastly, the truth is that

10} by filing the suit against the speaker, Zambry and his six exco members have allegedly infringed section 10 of the Legislative Assembly (Privileges) Enactment of Perak 1959 in that they had given evidence outside the Assembly in respect of the contents of documents laid before the Assembly or any committee without special leave of the Assembly.

Whether such an act by Zambry etl was tantamount to abuse of their privileges and whether such an abuse may attract a new sanction by the speaker remains to be seen.

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}
Embattled Tigers mull taking their war abroad

The Tamil Tigers may switch to using other Southeast Asian countries as support bases as their leaders change tack following setbacks in the war in Sri Lanka, writes NEVILLE DE SILVA.

EARLIER this month an English-language newspaper in Sri Lanka ran an analysis on the war with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), whose dream of an independent Tamil state of Eelam in the island is fast fading.The subhead to that article in the Lakbima News read:

"LTTE planning for fifth Eelam war -- in Malaysia".

With the Tigers' conventional army decimated and its leadership literally cornered on a sliver of land in a war that pundits claimed could never be won by either side, a new scenario is unfolding.

This could have dangerous implications for countries well beyond the borders of Sri Lanka.

Yet the gravity of it does not appear to have been fully appreciated.

The article did not spell out the wider issue but the message was clear enough:
military defeat in Sri Lanka is not the end of the 30-year war.

The battle for Eelam will be fought elsewhere, though the war of attrition will still be conducted in Sri Lanka.

While the southern Indian state of Tamil Nadu, whose 60 million Tamils have cultural and ethnic affinities with the Sri Lanka Tamils, would serve as the LTTE's rear base, Sri Lankan intelligence officials are increasingly concerned at what they perceive as burgeoning LTTE activities in Malaysia.

The Lakbima News article, while recalling the comments of Malaysian officials at the height of the Hindraf protests in 2007 about possible links between Indian Hindu organisations and the LTTE, said that the Tigers' chief arms buyer Kumaran Pathmanathan, alias "KP", wanted by Interpol, was reportedly operating now from Malaysia.

There was much speculation in Colombo that the Norwegian ambassador to Sri Lanka had travelled to a Southeast Asian country to meet "KP", and some said it was to Malaysia.

The ambassador was rebuked by Sri Lanka's Foreign Ministry.

This week, Sri Lanka withdrew recognition of Norway as the "peace facilitator".

Last Sunday, another Sri Lankan newspaper, The Nation, returned to the subject of the supposed Malaysian connection.

It said that army intelligence had information that LTTE leader Velupillai Prabhakaran's son Charles Anthony and military leader Sornam "had fled to Malaysia" for medical attention following injuries sustained in a recent clash.

"The LTTE is believed to be planning to establish their international network centre to be based in Malaysia," the newspaper said, adding that the strengthening of Sri Lanka's diplomatic mission in Kuala Lumpur was a result of this intelligence.

Malaysia, may not be the only Southeast Asian country where the LTTE, banned as a terrorist organisation by some 30 countries including India, is likely to set up support bases or revive dormant links for a different kind of war.

This would happen whether or not Prabhakaran survives the military offensive.

The LTTE has lost not just territory but several top commanders since President Mahinda Rajapaksa's government decided to carry the fight to the enemy three years ago, after six months of absorbing Tiger attacks.

During a visit to Thailand last month, Sri Lanka's Foreign Minister Rohitha Bogollagama warned Thai leaders of the danger to the region if the Tigers based themselves in Southeast Asia, given the presence of sizeable Indian and Sri Lankan Tamil communities there.

Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and his foreign and defence ministers vowed they would not allow Thailand to be used for activities that would destabilise friendly countries.

Abhisit said it was in "all our interests" to fight terrorism.

Indonesian Foreign Minister Hassan Wirajuda, on a visit to Sri Lanka last month, repeated the pledge that Indonesia would not allow activity prejudicial to Sri Lanka.

The LTTE's military setbacks in Sri Lanka have not diminished its capacity to collect funds.

Narcotics, smuggling and financial crimes are some ways of doing this, but the LTTE may also sell or barter its expertise to other extremist groups, or collaborate with them in training suicide bombers and using modern technology in terrorist attacks.

The website "South Asian Terrorism Portal" claimed that the LTTE provided forged passports to Ramzi Yousef, one of the planners of the first attack on the World Trade Centre in New York in 1993.

The website said there were intelligence reports that the LTTE was smuggling arms to various terrorist organisations, including Islamic groups in Pakistan and their counterparts in the Philippines.

The London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies said three years ago that the LTTE was building commercial links with al-Qaeda and other militants in Afghanistan, and that several of its cadres had been spotted in Afghan militant camps.

Glen Jenvey, an international terrorism specialist, claimed that al-Qaeda had emulated LTTE terror tactics, while the Washington-based Maritime Intelligence Group states that al-Qaeda learnt its terror tactics through LTTE contacts teaching Indonesians these dark arts.

Western nations with sizeable Tamil communities are being pressured to use their diplomatic clout to restrain or punish the Sri Lankan government.

If the LTTE compromises Southeast Asian nations' banking systems for money-laundering and transferring funds to front organisations, or joins hands with home-grown extremist or dissident groups, Southeast Asia might well be a battleground for a different kind of war against Sri Lanka.

* The writer is a veteran observer of Sri Lanka affairs, based in Colombo

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Semut Selangor

It is with much amusement/relief that I read this piece in The Star:
Friday April 17, 2009
People seek out MC ant to get day off work
By LESTER KONG

PETALING JAYA: The same type of ant which sent Butterworth boy Loh Kean Beng to the intensive care unit is also known as “MC ant” among some locals in Penang.

This is because there are people who voluntarily get a bite from the semut Selangor to induce dizziness and fever so that they can get a medical certificate (MC) and a day off work, claims the Seberang Prai municipal council’s special squad chief M. Raju.

“There is a coffee stall here under a tree where factory workers go to have coffee and also to have the ant bite them. After they get dizzy and feverish, they visit a clinic to get medical leave so they don’t have to go to work,” said Raju, who is tasked with tackling the ant problem.

He called the practice foolhardy and said the effects suffered by victims could vary greatly depending on the individual’s resistance to the ant’s poison.

“Some won’t feel anything. But there are many who can easily fall sick from the ant’s bite,” said Raju.

However, he had not heard of any deaths from the ant bite.

“This ant has been around for a long time. I have spoken to some older Indian estate workers and they know it as katta erumbu in Tamil,” he said in a phone interview.

He said while trying to find out more about the ant, the squad sent specimens and pictures to Universiti Sains Malaysia’s entomologist Prof Dr Lee Chow Wang, US entomologists Prof Dr Philip S. Ward of the University of California and Prof Dr Edward O. Wilson of Harvard Uni-versity.
“After they confirmed and identified the species, it was much easier for us to send out information to the public so that they would be careful not to get bitten by this ant,” Raju said.

He said the semut Selangor, which usually built nests on dead tree branches or stumps, were not aggressive and would not attack humans unless provoked.

“Some people walking under trees might have one fall on them. If they try to flick the ant off, the ant might bite them but it won’t have time to sting them with the poison. If so, they are lucky lah,” he said.

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Perak Perak Perak - I bleed with you

When the highest court in the land could bring down the Government of the day
By Justice Dato’ N.H. Chan
The front page of the Star newspaper of Friday, 17 April 2009 carries this startlingly outrageous decision of the Federal Court. The headline proclaims “Court: Siva does not have right to suspend seven”. The report reads:
PUTRAJAYA: The Federal Court has unanimously ruled that Perak Assembly Speaker V Sivakumar does not have the power to suspend Mentri Besar Datuk Zambry Abd Kadir and six state executive council members from attending the assembly.It granted a declaration that the seven assemblymen were entitled to take part in all the assembly sittings and to carry out their duties.Court of Appeal president Justice Alauddin Mohd Sheriff, who chaired a five-man panel yesterday, said the Speaker’s decision to suspend the seven applicants was ultra vires (outside the law) and invalid.… The other judges were Chief Judge of Malaya Arifin Zakaria and Federal Court Judges Nik Hashim Nik Ab. Rahman, S Augustine Paul and Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin.
This is a perverse judgement of the Federal Court. It is perverse because it is a decision that was made in blatant defiance of Article 72 (1) of the Federal Constitution which says,”The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”. The judges of the Federal Court have failed the people and the government of this country when they chose to ignore the law of the Constitution of Malaysia. In other words the judges have refused to do justice according to law.
Incidentally, ultra vires does not mean “outside the law”. It means “outside one’s jurisdiction, beyond the scope of one s power or authority”. And we may ask, who is the Federal Court to say what is beyond the jurisdiction of the Speaker when the supreme law of the country says that “the validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court”.
Don’t these judges realize that they have actually done a disservice to the Government of the day? Perhaps they have never heard of the Taff Vale case.
In 1900 the English House of Lords, which as you know is the highest court in the land just as our Federal Court is the highest court in this country, handed down an outrageous decision which was unpopular to the common people of England. The judges of the House of Lords by their judgment had unwittingly done a great disservice to the Conservative Government of the day because in the general election of 1906 it was toppled by a landslide. The case which was the cause of the fall of the Conservative Government by a landslide was Taff Vale Rly Co v Amalgamated Society of Railway Servants [1901] 1 QB 170, [1901] AC 426, HL. It is best that I let Lord Denning take up the story from his book Landmarks in the Law, Butterworths, London, 1984, pp 119-121:
There was the great Taff Vale case. To understand it, you must know that the trade unions were virtually friendly societies. The members paid their subscriptions into a fund out of which benefits could be paid to members if they were ill or out of employment. Now in the Taff Vale case the railwaymen’s union called a strike at the railway station at Cardiff. The men left work and set up peaceful pickets so as to persuade others not to go to work. The trains could not run, and the company lost money. The railway were advised to bring an action against the union itself, seeking an injunction and damages. The Court of Appeal threw out the action. But the House of Lords, in a startling judgment, overruled the Court of Appeal. They issued an interlocutory injunction against the trade union itself, restraining it from setting up the pickets, and said that the railway company could recover damages which could be enforced against trade union funds. Later, at the trial itself, the damages were assessed at £23,000 and that sum was paid out of the funds of the trade union. £23,000 in 1900. What would that be now?
In the eyes of trade unions, that was an outrageous decision. It meant that the railway company could take all the funds subscribed by the members so as to meet the damages. It meant that, in future, a trade union could never call a strike, else it would be in peril of losing all its funds. It meant virtually the end of trade
unions. As G.M. Trevelyan says in his History: ‘It struck at the very heart of trade union action’.
That case had immense political consequences. At the general election of 1906 there came into being a new political party. It was the Labour party. They ran a host of candidates themselves. They pledged complete immunity for trade unions. Many of the Liberal candidates gave the same pledge. The result of the general election was like an earthquake. Liberals had 397 seats. The new Labour party had 50 seats. The Conservatives only 157. It was a sweeping victory for the trade unions.
Parliament immediately passed the Trade Disputes Act 1906. It is probably the most important Act ever put into the Statute Book. It reversed all the judicial decisions against trade unions. The Taff Vale case was overruled. No trade union could there after be sued for damages for any wrongs done by its members. Its funds were unassailable.”
I think the message of the Taff Vale case to our judges of the Federal Court should be clear enough. The electorate may decide, just as the voters did in 1906 England to the Conservative Government, to use the power of their vote to unseat the BN government in the next by-election or general election because they do not trust the judges. Poor Najib our new Prime Minister, it is the judges who have let him down. Unfortunately it would be the Prime Minister who has to carry the baby, but not the irresponsible judges who did all the damage by not administering justice according to law.
To all those judges who think they are above the law, I would suggest that they pay careful attention to the warning by Lord Denning M.R. in Gouriet v. Union of Post Office Workers [1977] 1 Q.B. 729, 761-762:
To every subject in this land, no matter how powerful, I would use Thomas Fuller’s words over 300 years ago: “Be you never so high, the law is above you”
And the law, in the present context, is the Federal Constitution, in particular, Article 72 which states:
72. (1) The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court.
(2) No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him when taking part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of any State or of any committee thereof.
(3) No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything published by or under the authority of the Legislative Assembly of any State.
Suppose the Speaker Sivakumar were to ignore the declarative decree of the Federal Court, what then? Clause (2) of Article 72 of the Federal Constitution says that “No person shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him when taking part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of any State or of any committee thereof”. The Federal Court can say anything they like but the Speaker is not liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or any vote given by him when taking part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly. The order of the Federal Court seems to me to be a brutum fulmen which in Latin means “ineffectual thunderbolt; (action which is) loud but ineffective”. It reminds me of the words of Horace: Parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus which in Latin means “Mountains will be in labour, the birth will be a single laughable mouse”.
The errant judges of the Federal Court should heed the warning of the late Lord Denning, What Next in the Law, Butterworths, London, 1982, p 330:
May not the judges themselves sometimes abuse or misuse their power? It is their duty to administer and apply the law of the land. If they should divert it or depart from it a - and do so knowingly - they themselves would be guilty of a misuse of power.
And he posed this question:
Suppose a future Prime Minister should seek to pack the Bench with judges of his own extreme political colour. Would they be tools in his hand?

Pakatan to fight BN all the way for Perak
By Baradan Kuppusamy, The Malaysian Insider
The move to suspend Perak state assembly secretary Abdullah Antong Sabri today is a signal that neither the Speaker V. Sivakumar nor the Pakatan Rakyat is going to concede control of the legislature to the Barisan Nasional without a fight.
The issue was debated long and hard by top PR leaders in Penang today and the decision is to fight BN every inch of the way.
A number of PR leaders feel that since they consider the upcoming assembly “illegal,” their attendance may legitimise it.
But after heated debate the decision was taken to attend the assembly or otherwise it was felt BN would have a free hand to do what it liked.
A senior PR leader who attended the three-hour meeting said they would fight BN every step of the way.
“We have Plans A, B and C,” the leader said, promising a “climatic” outcome to the May 7 face-off between PR and BN.
The suspension of Abdullah by Sivakumar today is the first move by PR in what has become a game of wits.
Sivakumar first suspended Abdullah on March 3 for failing to take his instruction and he suspended him again today for sending out notices to all representatives for the assembly to convene on May 7.
“I am the Speaker and I am acting in accordance with all the rules and regulations of the Perak constitution,” Sivakumar said when contacted.
He declined further comment, citing possible legal complications.
Earlier, he told reporters in Ipoh that he had appointed Mohd Misbahul Munir Marduki as secretary of the state assembly.
He said the “purported sitting” on May 7 should not proceed pending further clarification.
Meanwhile, Ipoh Barat MP M. Kulasegaran said Sivakumar was neither informed nor consulted on the May 7 sitting.
“This act of calling an assembly sitting over the head of the Speaker is not only blatant but a direct usurpation of the powers of the Speaker by the mentri besar,” he told The Malaysian Insider.
“This is a coup… no less. This is against democracy,” he said.
He also said the courts had no business ruling on issues involving the legislature as the constitution clearly bars any interference by the judiciary.
“We are surprise and shocked by recent court decisions,” he said.
On Thursday, the Federal Court lifted Sivakumar's suspension of the MB and his six executive councillors from the state legislature.
The ruling has sparked controversy because it appears to ignore the principle of separation of powers and constitutional provisions which say proceedings of the legislature cannot be questioned in a court of law.
Although Sivakumar has suspended Abdullah and appointed another secretary who is presumably favourable to him, it remains unclear if the suspension will stop BN from convening the assembly sitting.
It is learned that the first matter on the agenda is the removal of Sivakumar as Speaker because being hostile to the BN, he can — theoretically — use the powers of his office to ruin any moves by BN to claim legitimacy in its power grab.
When the assembly first convened after the March 8 general election last year the first matter in the order of business was the election of a Speaker.
That part of the assembly was chaired by Abdullah and Sivakumar was elected Speaker.
Sources said that since the first matter is the election of a new Speaker, either Abdullah or even the Deputy Speaker, the former DAP assemblywoman Hee Yit Fong, could chair proceedings.
They said a separate lawsuit to determine whether BN's Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir or PR's Datuk Seri Nizar Jamaluddin is the legitimate MB could be brought forward to the end of this month.
If the court holds that Zambry is the lawful mentri besar, it would remove the final legal hurdle for BN.

Nothing is lost
By Selvarajasomiah
April 17th.2009
I believe by this Federal court decision the court has set a precedent as it can now review whatever the Speaker says or do even though the Speaker’s power is paramount.
Anyway, the decision of the courts must be respected, but, has anything changed in the Perak State Assembly from this Federal court decision? No, nothing has changed guys. The Speaker’s powers is still intact and decisions are still his to call. Speaker V. Sivakumar is still the boss in the Assembly and he can still frustrate Zambry Kadir and Gang who have defied Perak State Assembly procedures with new charges for contempt of the Assembly.
As long as Speaker V Sivakumar conducts the State Assembly proceedings according to procedures he cannot be frustrated by Zambry & Gang as the Speaker remains the final interpreter.
So, NOTHING IS LOST as the Speaker is still V Sivakumar although Sivakumar has been denied his right to suspend Zambry & Gang.
Indeed the next State Assembly sitting will be evidence that the Perak State Constitution is still supreme in the state of Perak.

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Friday, 17 April 2009

MAGICK RIVER: Where Malaysia is headed (Part 4)

MAGICK RIVER: Where Malaysia is headed (Part 4)

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

I am just a Keling

Saturday, February 21, 2009
I am Just a ‘Keling’…
…and I am anjing. I am a low-life and not worthy of respect and decency. This is the kind of attitude we have seen expressed by certain teachers directed no less at our children! As if such vile racism was not abhorrent enough in itself, we have to come to terms with the fact that our children are being subjected to such uncouth and repulsive violence.
A verbal assault such as the kind endured by A Kuganeshwaran cannot be simply brushed aside as an aberration. This despicable assault on Kuganeshwaran is of course an assault on all those other students in the class – who witness and endure such violence against their fellow students. And if they too, like Kuganeshwaran, are violated, feel threatened, and intimidated by such conduct, imagine the damage we continue to allow these so-called teachers to inflict on our children.
How are we to undo this kind of damage? How are we to also prevent other students from appreciating that such despicable behaviour is not to be emulated? When will our teachers, principals and others responsible for our children’s well-being and development address this kind of violence against students in our schools?
Some politicians seem to be worried that such bad publicity damages the image of the government. How sad. Even when politicians try to address such behaviour, they fail miserably because they seem more concerned with the political consequences of such bad publicity for the government than redressing the inherent injustice.
Do you suppose these politicians, who by the way, don’t seem to think that we so-called ‘anjings’ are discriminated against, might start getting worried that there might a backlash against the government? Well, would it surprise you to see that politicians would trying to make a meal out of this episode and the teacher concerned because there are some high-profile by-elections in the horizon? Don’t be the least surprised.
Sure, the so-called teacher concerned in this situation has no business being in a classroom. I think we can all agree on that. But why do you suppose it is that such episodes tend to repeat themselves in our schools ever so often? Why do you suppose it is that people in positions of power and authority, such as the police and teachers, seem to have the audacity to indulge in repeated violence against us so-called ‘kelings.’?
Is it that because we are seen as lesser? Is it because we are devalued and therefore it becomes possible to unleash such violence against us and our young? Why does such behaviour not shock me anymore? Why?
Well, if our leaders can be in denial of our state of affairs, should I really be shocked that they’re also in denial that their complacency and stubbornness to address our plight should have such vile consequences?
Why is it that we repeatedly find such episodes of blatant racist assaults unleashed against us?
I am left with only one plausible explanation – whether it is spoken or implied, to them, I am just a ‘keling.’
G. Krishnan

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}
under COALITION OF MALAYSIANS OF INDIAN HERITAGE{ COMALIH }

Saturday, 21 February 2009

Nurul's Plea


Dear Friends,
I am writing this letter to you, Bangsar residents and visitors,
because as of now, the crime rate in Bangsar has reached alarming levels.
More and more people in Bangsar are becoming victims of snatch thefts, break-ins, and assaults. Even prostitutes are now seen along Jalan Telawi nowadays.
Many of you have written letters to inform me of all the above, thank you for doing so.
I have to emphasize that I welcome any kinds of comments, criticisms and constructive arguments.
I believe it’ll help me to assist you better.
But do remember, that while I am here to help.
I cannot do it alone.
Thus far, I have managed to conduct dialogue sessions with the police (both closed, and open door meetings), make unannounced visits to different police stations in Bangsar, Pantai Dalam, Sri Sentosa, and ultimately request for formal meetings with top police echelons in Brickfields.
It is important to hightlight the ever persistent issue of crime in Bangsar, as well as other areas in Lembah Pantai.
We must speak up against crime, such as the assault that took place even at commonly frequented sites such as the Gujerati Association.
I met with the community at the crime scene, bringing together, them (the affected community) with C/Insp. Mat Shahrizan Said (the OCS of Pantai Police Station).
It is a frightful thought to worry about our childrens’ safety when they are having activities at the center, especially when police patrol exists.
I will continue to highlight these issues to the media, as well as raise them in Parliament.
But again, the most important avenue I have is to appeal for your help.
Please come out and state your concerns in front of the police this 28th of February at Pusat Komuniti Bukit Damansara (near Sekolah Sri Cempaka).
Let’s unite in our effort to help create a safer environment for our children, family and friends.
This session will include suggestions for the police to improve their services.
We will open these suggestions for a frank discussion with the people of Bangsar and the Police.
I have invited the Deputy OCPD of Brickfields, Supt. Azri Rahman to the forum.
To ensure we are not faulted for not cooperating with security apparatus, I must also ask all of you to lodge a police report if you have been a victim of crime.
No matter how difficult the process may be, we must register crime into the national statistics. The thrust of our campaign from now on will be “LODGE A REPORT. PUNISH THE VILLAINS!”.
We must do our part, and the police will always be reminded to do theirs!
Join me this Saturday, 28th February 2009,{10.00am} at Pusat Komuniti Bukit Damansara (near Sekolah Sri Cempaka, next to Saidina Omar Mosque).
Or visit http://www.nurulizzah.com/site/stopcrime/ for more info.
Nurul Izzah, MP
Lembah Pantai
19th February 2009
+++++

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Tuesday, 27 January 2009

Custodial Deaths






 simply click on the following URL / URI:  Site: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/vazeeralam/16841-a-dearth-of-death-inquests  P/S: This may be a restricted content which requires you to be registered on the  site. 

Monday, 26 January 2009











Yang Amat Berhormat Dato' Seri Abdullah bin Haji Ahmad BadawiPrime Minister of MalaysiaPrime Minister's OfficeMain BlockPerdana Putra BuildingFederal Government Administrative Centre62502 PutrajayaMALAYSIA
Dear Pak Lah,Kong Hee Fatt Choy, Pak Lah. I trust this second open letter finds you in good health. I was told by a reliable source that you read my first open letter.
So I thought, since this appears to be the only way to reach you, I would send you a second open letter. I truly hope you get to read this one as well.
Sorry I was not able to also send you my Selamat Hari Raya Puasa wishes. It is not that Chinese New Year is more important than Hari Raya.
During Hari Raya Puasa I was in the Kamunting Detention Centre, courtesy of your government. So, I sort of missed Hari Raya, if you know what I mean.
But I believe my friends did attend your open house at the PWTC to send you Hari Raya wishes on my behalf, wearing ‘Free RPK’ T-shirts, much to the chagrin of the police who summoned them to the police station later for their ‘statements to be recorded’.
In the past I used to be sad if I was ever away from the family on Hari Raya, not that it happened too often. Even rough and tough Malaysian soldiers serving overseas cry on Hari Raya, so I was told.
So it’s not lack of macho that makes you sad when parted from the family on Hari Raya. This time, however, anger overcame my sadness. Instead of being sad, I decided to ‘boycott’ Hari Raya.
Maybe anger is a stronger emotion.
Anyway, I did not celebrate the recent Hari Raya Haji as well, though I had already been released from detention by then. I have sort of shut out Hari Raya from my mind and have convinced myself that the festival does not exist.
I think, from now on, Hari Raya no longer means anything to me.I suppose this is very useful considering the Attorney General is appealing the Shah Alam High Court decision releasing me from ISA detention.
The government’s appeal will be heard in the Federal Court in Putrajaya on 11 February 2009 and if the Federal Court allows the appeal then I will be sent back to Kamunting to serve my two years detention order.
So it is necessary that I continue being angry and not get sad about things like being under detention on Hari Raya. Anger makes you strong to resist the powers-that-be. Sadness weakens you.
I really don’t know if the Federal Court will uphold the Shah Alam High Court’s decision to free me. If it does, well and good.
But if it overturns that decision then you better get ready for a bloody fight, Pak Lah.
Sure, the government can ‘legally’ send me back to Kamunting. But I shall be going back there screaming and kicking. The government is going to see a fight never before seen in the history of the almost 50 years of the ISA. And this is no threat.
It is a promise.
And, as I said, anger is an extremely powerful emotion, which can make you move mountains.Anyway, that is not the purpose of this open letter.
What I want to talk about today is with regards to the current controversy swamping this country, in particular the police brutality issue.
This is actually not something new.
It has been going on since before Merdeka.
When I was a teenager in the 1960s I have personally witnessed and experienced many incidences of police beatings.
Your late wife Endon’s brother, Osman, can testify to this.
hen I got my motorcycle licence at the age of 15 in 1965, my first bike ride was with Osman.
I fetched him from your house in Bellamy Road and we went Jackie’s Bowl in Jalan Ampang and got high on weed all night long.
You see, Pak Lah, in those days we used to sport long hair and wear tight trousers and the police somehow became very upset with this ‘fashion statement’.
The police would push a bottle down our trousers and if it could not fall to our feet then we would get beaten up. The same applied to our hair.
If it dropped over our forehead or touched our ears we would get beaten up as well.
o imagine what we had to go through in the 1960s since we had long hair and wore tight trousers. As I said, Osman, the brother of your late wife, can tell you more about this as we used to run in the same pack.
One night in 1965, while waiting at a bus stop along Jalan Ampang (in front of the El Chico next to the AIA building), a few of us -- Tun Dr Siti Hasmah’s nephew, Azlan Aziz, included -- were picked up by the police.
Our only ‘crime’ was that we were sitting at the bus stop.
The police took us to the High Street Police Station and we were all asked to line up to witness the police beating up a Chinese youth.
They beat him real bad and he was coughing blood.
I don’t know if he died after that but I would not want to put my money on whether he survived.
It became so bad that whenever we saw the police we would run away. We actually became quite good at it.
For example, once, about ten of us were sitting on our bikes in front of the HKL and a police van stopped and about a dozen police jumped out.
We leaped on our bikes and managed to escape just as the police were within an arms-length from us. They pursued us along Jalan Tun Razak with little success.
Our bike numbers were on the top-ten list of the police’s ‘most wanted’ but they never caught us.
We knew if they did they would beat the shit out of us so it was definitely an ‘incentive’ for us to never get caught.
That was how it was back in the 1960s and, trust me, it has not changed one bit.
The police still beat the shit out of you if you ever find yourself in the most unfortunate situation of ending up in their lockup.
In fact, your Director of the CID, Bakri Zinin, once beat me up in March 2001 in front of my wife and six other detainees and about a dozen police personnel.
My only ‘crime’ was that I had walked into the Dang Wangi Police Station.
I had not committed any crime or was under arrest.
I had, on my own accord, walked into the police station and Bakri Zinin happened to be in the mood to beat someone up.
So he beat me up.
After he beat me up he arrested me and kept me overnight in the lockup under no charges whatsoever.
That is how your police operate.
And these are all Muslims, mind you.
I bet they even pray five times a day and their wives wear tudongs.
Now do you know why I am most unkind to Muslims?
Many are hypocrites of the highest degree.
I know you tried to implement the IPCMC but were prevented from doing so.
And the reason you are not able to implement the IPCMC is because the police, whom represent the major portion of postal voters, threatened to vote opposition if you do. (IPCMC: Police threaten to vote for the Opposition).
In the March 2008 general election, the opposition needed only 300,000 more votes to form the federal government.
Therefore, if the postal votes had gone to the opposition, Barisan Nasional would have been out of power.
To ensure that the postal votes remained with Barisan Nasional you succumbed to the threats and agreed to compromise on the IPCMC.
In that sense, Pak Lah, you are indirectly responsible for the continuing problem of police brutality. What the police are doing is your fault.
This is a classic case of the tail wagging the dog and not the dog wagging the tail.
Maybe you would like to reconsider your decision on the IPCMC and demonstrate to the nation that you, and not the police, are running this country.
While on the subject of the police, let it be known that the police managed to reduce Pakatan Rakyat’s majority in the recent Kuala Terengganu by-election from more than 7,000 votes to a mere 2,631.
And I have this on video if you would like to see the evidence.
You know that the opposition’s majority in the Kuala Terengganu by-election was much higher than 2,631.
And I am sure this is troubling you to no end.
And I am equally sure you know that this is because the people do not want Najib Tun Razak to take over as Prime Minister in March.
As much as you may try to deny this you know I am spot on.
At 3.00pm on Polling Day, the police set up ten roadblocks and no one in town could get out nor those outside town could get in.
Kuala Terengganu was totally cordoned off and the traffic jams were so massive that the town was reduced to a gridlock.
I was arguing with the police at three different locations and, as I said, I have this on video.
At one roadblock, when the police told me that this was ‘arahan dari atas’, I responded by saying that ‘kalau orang atas bodoh dan kita ikut arahan tersebut maka kita juga bodoh’.
You should have seen the police stare at me.
They looked like they wanted to kill me.
By 4.00pm, voting almost ground to a halt and the 74% voter turnout troubled me.
74% was too low and since the SPR had announced earlier that morning that the voter turnout was going to be 80% I was worried that this would mean another 6% or so are going to be ‘phantom voters’.
True enough, an hour later, when polling ended, the voter turnout jumped to 81%. It was later ‘adjusted’ to 79%.
This means 5% to 7% additional votes came in although no one was voting any longer.
This represents about 5,000 votes or thereabouts.
Say what you like, the opposition not only won the Kuala Terengganu by-election, but it won with a large majority.
And this was in spite of Najib and his wife campaigning fulltime in Terengganu and the RM500 million that was committed to the by-election effort.
No doubt RM400 million was spent indirectly when Najib launched the special investment fund. Nevertheless, this RM400 million was still for purposes of the by-election and no one can deny this.
Mind you, the RM500 million is just my conservative estimate.
It could be more.
But it still makes the Kuala Terengganu by-election the most expensive by-election in Malaysian history and yet Barisan Nasional lost, whether it was by 2,631 votes or 7,631 votes.
The police air-conditioned tents alone came to RM10 million.
The food, at about RM50 to RM60 per day per person over three weeks, came to another RM10 million.
Then there was the outstation allowance and so on.
I estimate the cost of stationing 8,000 police personnel in Kuala Terengganu over three weeks at about RM25 million to RM30 million.
And it could actually be more considering the normal ‘leakages’ in government expenditure.
Then there are the many free dinners and the RM300 to RM1,000 ‘Ang Pows’ for the 80,000 or so voters.
Even the press people received RM300 Ang Pows each, though none were offered to the Bloggers, for whatever reason I do not know.
Are you happy, Pak Lah, that Najib spent about RM500 million in the most expensive by-election in Malaysian history and Barisan Nasional still lost?
How does this reflect on the confidence the people have in Najib?
Do you know that the ‘battle-cry’ in the Kuala Terengganu by-election was the song ‘Najib Altantuya Mongolia’ sung to the tune ‘When the Saints Come Marching in’?
Young Malays from the kampong who you would least expect to know this ‘Christian’ song were singing this song.
Yes, say what you like, the Kuala Terengganu by-election was not a by-election.
It was a vote of no confidence against Najib.
And it was the Malays who voted against Najib -- and young Malays at that, Malays from the kampong.
Did not Musa Hitam and Ghafar Baba, both one-time Deputy Prime Ministers, say that Umno’s strength is in the rural areas and that Umno needs to gain the support of the kampong Malays to stay in power?
Well, the kampong Malays have spoken on 21 January 2009 in the Kuala Terengganu by-election.
I am just not sure whether you heard them; that’s all.
If you did not then I am telling you now.
The young Malays from the kampong have said no to Najib.
Do you still want to ignore this message and doom Umno to the political graveyard?
There is much more I need to tell you but allow me to end my open letter here, for the meantime.
I now need to go attend the PKR Chinese New year open house in Kelang and go hassle Anwar Ibrahim on this Anti-ISA thing that I want the five Pakatan Rakyat states to commit themselves to.
Till we talk again, take care, as there are many surrounding you with daggers drawn -- which makes Julius Caesar’s predicament a picnic by comparison.
Is it not ironical that in your present situation you can trust your enemies more than your friends?
Anyway, once again, Kong Hee Fatt Choy, Pak Lah.Yours truly,Raja Petra Al Haj Bin Raja Kamarudin

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Sunday, 25 January 2009

A Little Taffer's Room : Clue Hunting Anyone?





8-)
Blog: A Little Taffer's Room
Post: Clue Hunting Anyone?
Link: http://melvin-mah.blogspot.com/2009/01/clue-hunting-anyone.html

--
Powered by Blogger
http://www.blogger.com/

Nuraina A Samad's 3540 Jalan Sudin: More Indians In Police Force, Please....#links



Nuraina A Samad's 3540 Jalan Sudin: More Indians In Police Force, Please....#links

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Saturday, 24 January 2009


Lock Em Up & Throw the Keys Away!



SHAH ALAM: Police have, with immediate effect, removed 11 constables and lance corporals from the Subang Taipan police station where the case of A. Kugan, a detainee, who died in their custody, was reclassified as murder yesterday.
Selangor police chief Datuk Khalid Abu Bakar said the policemen were currently at the contingent headquarters here doing desk duties."They are here to speed up the investigation. We expect to complete the investigations within three days."Police are still recording and compiling statements. Once the investigations are complete we will decide on the next course of action depending on the investigations report."In Kuching, Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Musa Hassan said an in-depth investigation would be carried out.
He said this was despite the initial post-mortem which indicated that Kugan had died of pulmonary edema or fluid accumulation in the lungs.Musa, however, condemned the actions of a mob which forced its way into the Serdang Hospital mortuary on Tuesday night, evicted the hospital staff and locked themselves in for two hours.They were believed to have taken pictures of Kugan's body, which they claimed had bruises all over."The mob incident has only tampered with evidence, which shouldn't happen in the first place. The group should not have obstructed the medical team from performing their duties that night," said Musa after chairing the 1st Tripartite meeting between the police chiefs of Malaysia, Indonesia and Brunei yesterday.Police have also contacted the two deputy ministers, Senator T. Murugiah and Datuk S.K. Devamany, both with the Prime Minister's Department, to have their statements recorded.Both were said to have been there during the incident. In Kuala Lumpur, Devamany, while saying that he would cooperate with the police, added: "The reclassification of the case as murder is good. I don't regret going there (mortuary). The rakyat needed us (Murugiah and him). "After all, as an MIC central working committee member and as a deputy minister, this is my job...to serve the rakyat and to serve the Indian community when they needed help."If there is no foul play, then no one should be afraid. Let the law prevail. For now, I can see that with the murder charges, justice has prevailed," he saidPolice have also identified most of the 50 people in the mob at the mortuary.Meanwhile, the Malaysian Human Rights Commission welcomed Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail's instruction to the police to investigate the death of Kugan.Its chairman, Tan Sri Abu Talib Othman, said probing the death was the "right thing to do"."Let the police gather evidence so that the attorney-general can act without fear or favour and for the next course of action to be taken," he said.The Malaysian Bar hoped the authorities' attention would not be focused on the incident at the mortuary while investigating Kugan's death. Its president, Datuk Ambiga Sreenivasan, said the people's reaction only reflected their feelings who were understandably outraged and emotional over the death. Ambiga said this incident once again prompts for an Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission to be set up."We also call on the authorities to expedite the ongoing inquests into other custodial deaths," she said.


posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

21 deny illegal assembly charge





This article is from The Star Online (http://thestar.com.my/) URL: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/24/nation/3107842&sec=nation __________________________________________________________________________ PETALING JAYA: A total of 21 people, including an MP, two assemblymen and a Catholic priest, were charged in the Sessions Court here with taking part in an illegal assembly and failing to disperse when ordered to do so. Petaling Jaya Utara MP Tony Pua, Selangor executive council member Ronnie Liu, Kampong Tunku assemblyman Lau Weng San, Reverend Father Paulino Francesco Miranda of the Church of Divine Mercy and the rest were charged under the Police Act. The group, aged between 25 a nd 62, were accused of taking part in an illegal gathering in front of the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) building on Oct 9 last year between 9pm and 10.10pm and failing to disperse after a police order was given by Supt Mohamad Shukor Sulong at about 9.50pm. Counsel and client: Lim (left) and Liu walking out of the courtroom in Petaling Jaya Friday. All pleaded not guilty. DPP Noorin Badaruddin asked for RM5,000 bail on one surety for each accused and their passports to be surrendered to the court to ensure their attendance in court. However, lead defence counsel Gobind Singh Deo argued that the amount was unreasonably high as most of the accused were Chinese and they would need money for the coming Chinese New Year. "These (people) are MPs (and assemblymen) ... We MPs do not run away," said the Puchong MP, adding that the Public Prosecutor needed to prove the motive for the 21 people to abscond. Gobind Singh also asked for leniency with the bail amount as the case did not involve any violence, bloodshed or stolen property. Segambut MP Lim Lip Eng, who represented Pua, Liu and Lau, said the MBPJ building was a property of the Selangor state government and the state officials were merely "doing their own business in their own property". Judge Balqis Aini Mohd Ali set bail at RM1,500 on one surety for each accused and denied the DPP's request to impound the passports of the 21 accused. She also set March 10 for the case to be mentioned. The courtroom was packed with the 21 accused, lawyers, reporters and supporters, forcing some of them to stand for over an hour during the bail and condition argument. __________________________________________________________________________ Your one-stop information portal: The Star Online http://thestar.com.my/ Copyright © 1995-2009 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Star Publications is prohibited.

A-G asks police to classify case as murder





This article is from The Star Online (http://thestar.com.my/) URL: http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2009/1/24/nation/3112245&sec=nation   __________________________________________________________________________    KUALA LUMPUR: Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail has asked police to  classify the death of suspected car thief A. Kugan as murder for investigation  purposes.    He said he had met Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar, who  brought photographs of Kugan taken by both police as well as outsiders at the  Serdang mortuary.    "After studying the photos and investigation papers, I suggested to the Deputy  IGP to classify the case under Section 302 of the Penal Code.    "If investigations reveal that he died from being assaulted, then those    responsible will be charged with murder.    "If there is no evidence to suggest foul play, then the matter must be laid to  rest and also not be politicised," he said.    Responding to the family's request for a second post-mortem to be done, Abdul  Gani said they could go ahead and do as they wished as police had already  surrendered the body to the family. "However, it must be done in accordance with  the law," he added.    Ismail assured Kugan's family and the public that police would not cover up any  wrongdoing, adding that an independent team had been appointed to investigate  the case.    Kugan, 22, who was held under a two-week remand for investigations into several  luxury car theft cases, collapsed and died at the Taipan police station in USJ,  Subang Jaya, on Tuesday.    Abdul Gani said he had told Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister's Department  Senator T. Murugiah the same thing that he told Ismail, "nothing more and  nothing less".    At a press conference earlier, Murugiah said Abdul Ghani had told him in a phone  conversation that police would investigate the murder thoroughly and that the  culprits could be brought to court as early as next week.  __________________________________________________________________________ Your one-stop information portal: The Star Online http://thestar.com.my/   Copyright © 1995-2009 Star Publications (Malaysia) Bhd. All rights reserved.  Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written  permission of Star Publications is prohibited.   

  Year of the Ox -- Chinese New Year eCard from Yahoo! Greetings
My purpose is to alleviate chaos
And perpetuate stability
To hold my ground against
Hardship, danger and adversity
Steadfast and above reproach
I am here to enforce honour and fair play
To set a moral code
By becoming one with nature,
Constantly working toward my goal
To bring about harmony and good fortune,
I AM THE OX 
(source: Eugenia Last, Special to Sun Media)
 
May you all enjoy a stable and harmonious Year of the Ox.
Kung Hei Fat Choy ......................  Sun Leen Fai Lok
 
With warmest wishes
Lina

Thursday, 22 January 2009

Knights Templar : Palestine and God - The Joke and The Joker




Blog: Knights Templar
Post: Palestine and God - The Joke and The Joker
Link: http://jedi-knightstemplar.blogspot.com/2009/01/palestine-and-god-joke-and-joker.html

--
Powered by Blogger
http://www.blogger.com/

MarGeeMar: Myanmar Calling!




MarGeeMar: MYANMAR: A GENOCIDE MALAYSIA IS BLIND & DEAF TO

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Sunday, 18 January 2009

KuLi & Malaysia for 2009 onwards




posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Lawyer Kampung : What's up KT?


Blog: Lawyer Kampung
Post: What's up KT?
Link: http://lawyer-kampung.blogspot.com/2009/01/whats-up-kt.html

--
Powered by Blogger
http://www.blogger.com/

Sri Lanka




-----Original Message-----
Sun, 18 Jan 2009 3:42 am
Subject: Sri Lanka

  i,would like to share this article / content with you. To visit  this article / content, simply click on the following URL / URI:  Site: http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/opinion/breaking-views/136-breaking-views/16017-and-then-they-came-for-me-lasantha-wickramatunga  P/S: This may be a restricted content which requires you to be registered on the  site. 

Nuraina A Samad's 3540 Jalan Sudin: Good One, Datuk Zainun..#links


Nuraina A Samad's 3540 Jalan Sudin: Good One, Datuk Zainun..#links

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Sunday, 11 January 2009

MAGICK RIVER: LET THEM EAT KETUPAT!




MAGICK RIVER: LET THEM EAT KETUPAT!

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

MAGICK RIVER: You do us proud, Jomo!




MAGICK RIVER: You do us proud, Jomo!

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Tuesday, 6 January 2009

In case you need a lauth at times of high stress... enjoy!

 
These are from a book called 'Disorder in the American Courts',
and are things people actually said in court, word for word ,
 taken down and now published by court reporters who had
the torment of staying calm (and not laughing out loud)
while these exchanges were actually taking place.  
 


ATTORNEY:   Are you sexually active?
WITNESS:      No, I just lie there.
____________________________________________________________________
ATTORNEY:  What gear were you in at the moment of the impact?
WITNESS:     Gucci sweats and Reeboks.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:   This myasthenia gravis, does it affect your memory at all?
WITNESS:       Yes.
ATTORNEY:   And in what ways does it affect your memory?
WITNESS:       I forget.
ATTORNEY:   You forget? Can you give us an example of something you forgot?
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY:  What was the first thing your husband said to you that morning?
WITNESS:     He sa id, 'Where am I, Cathy?'
ATTORNEY:  And why did that upset you?
WITNESS:     My name is Susan!
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:   Do you know if your daughter has ever been involved in voodoo?
WITNESS:     We both do.
ATTORNEY:  Voodoo?
WITNESS:     We do.
ATTORNEY:  You do?
WITNESS:     Yes, voodoo.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:  Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?
WITNESS:    Did you actually pass the bar exam?
____________________________________
ATTORNEY:  The youngest son, the twenty-year-old, how old is he?
WITNESS:      Uh, he's twenty-one.
________________________________________
ATTORNEY:  Were you present when your picture was taken?
WITNESS:     Are you shittin' me?
___________ _ __________________________
ATTORNEY:   So the date of conception (of the baby) was August 8th?
WITNESS:      Yes.
ATTORNEY:  And what were you doing at that time?
WITNESS:     Uh.... I was getting' laid!
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:    She had three children, right?
WITNESS:      Yes.
ATTORNEY:    How many were boys?
WITNESS:      None.
ATTORNEY:    Were there any girls?
WITNESS:     Are you shittin' me? Your Honor, I think I need a different attorney.
Can I get a new attorney?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:   How was your first marriage terminated?
WITNESS:     By death.
ATTORNEY:   And by whose death was it terminated?
WITNESS:    Now whose death do you suppose terminated it?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:  Can you describe the individual?
WITNESS:     He was about medium height and had a beard.
ATTORNEY:  Was this a male or a female?
WITNESS:    Guess.
_____________________________________
ATTORNEY:   Is your appearance here this morning pursuant to a deposition notice which I sent to your attorney?
WITNESS:     No, this is how I dress when I go to work.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:   Doctor, how many of your autopsies have you performed on dead people?
WITNESS:      All my autopsies are performed on dead people.
Would you like to rephrase that?
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:   ALL your responses MUST be oral, OK? What school did you go to?
WITNESS:      Oral.
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:  Do you recall the time that you examined the body?
WITNESS:     The autopsy started around 8 :30 p.m.
ATTORNEY:  And Mr. Denton was dead at the time?
WITNESS:     No, he was sitting on the table wondering why I was doing an autopsy on him!
____________________________________________
ATTORNEY:   Are you qualified to give a urine sample?
WITNESS:  Huh....are you qualified to ask that question?
______________________________________
And the best for last:
______________________________________
ATTORNEY:   Doctor, before you performed the autopsy, did you check for a pulse?
WITNESS:      No.
ATTORNEY:   Did you check for blood pressure?
WITNESS:      No.
ATTORNEY:   Did you check for breathing?
WITNESS:      No.
ATTORNEY:  So, then it is possible that the patient was alive when you began the autopsy?
WITNESS:      No.
ATTORNEY:   How can you be so sure, Doctor?
WITNESS:      Because hi s brain was sitting on my desk in a jar.
ATTORNEY:  I see, but could the patient have still been alive, nevertheless?
WITNESS:      Yes, it is possible that he could have been alive and practicing law.

Friday, 2 January 2009

UMNO USING PROXIES TO HIJACK SUPPORT FROM HINDRAF FOR ITSELF!!! ~...


Oopps!

Blog: MarGeeMar
Post: UMNO USING PROXIES TO HIJACK SUPPORT FROM HINDRAF FOR ITSELF!!! ~ Malaysiakini
Link: http://margeemar.blogspot.com/2009/01/umno-using-proxies-to-hijack-support.html

--
Powered by Blogger
http://www.blogger.com/


Check out what's new @ The Cooking House



-----Original Message-----
From: The Cooking House 3 <thecookinghouse3@gmail.com>
Sent: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 1:31 am
Subject: Check out what's new @ The Cooking House


Dear Valued Customer,
 
 
We wish you and your family a healthy and wealthy 2009!
 
 
Please take some time to browse through the attached schedule and see what we have planned for you this month. There will be many more new surprises coming your way soon.
 
 
We value your feedbacks and would like to hear from you on how we could serve you better.
Thank you for your continuous support and we look forward to seeing you soon.
 
 
GREAT NEW YEAR SAVINGS ONLY IN JANUARY
5% discount for 1 class, 10% discount for 2 classes, 15% discount for 3 classes
 
Please note that pre-payment is required to enjoy the discount
 
 
Yours Sincerely,
The Cooking House
 
 
 
"Birthday Party, Private Dining, Special Celebration, Business Meeting, Exclusive Catering"

www.thecookinghouse.com
Tel/fax: 03-23001070

 20-1, Jalan 31/70A, Desa Sri Hartamas, 50480 Kuala Lumpur

 

Monday, 29 December 2008

Barbados

Barbados Court Attempts To Have Closed Bail Hearings For Arrested Journalists
Power Of Numbers Prevails As Barbados Court Opens To The Public
On Monday, a Barbados judge changed an earlier decision to have a closed bail hearing for the two freelance journalists arrested last Saturday when they tried to take photographs of a police officer charged with dealing in cocaine. (See Nation stories: Journalists Show Support & Media Close Ranks)
Despite the fact that only “some” family and media colleagues were allowed into the court, this was a stunning victory by the dozens of local news media people who showed up to support freelancers Cherie Pitt and Jimmy Gittens. It just shows what can happen when a few determined people challenge the system and say “This is wrong.”
Barbados Courts Often Operate In Secret, Closed Hearings
It may surprise our foreign readership to learn that here on Barbados, people are often brought before the closed courts where what happens is kept from the public. Judges on this island will order their court closed on the flimsiest of excuses so charges can be processed, dropped or negotiated to resolutions that would disturb the citizens if they only knew.
Transcripts of proceddings are seldom available even to lawyers - let alone to the media or public. Many “hearings” happen in the judges’ chambers where deals are sometimes made to “quietly let things fade away.”
The Barbados news media has often been part of such coverups and it is not uncommon for stories to just drop off the news media radar at the same time that deals are done in closed courts. Nothing is ever said again and the media remains quiet.
But the news media were not willing to let that happen on Monday with two of their own being dragged before a “closed to the public” court. They pushed, used their numbers and their power and the judge soon decided that the “public interest” required an open process in an open court.
We Have Two Messages For Members of the “Professional” Barbados Media
1. Congratulations on pressuring the judge to have an open process in an open court.
2. Why hasn’t the media made an issue of closed court hearings before? Why only when two of your own are before the court? Has the “professional” Barbados journalism community now decided that this abuse by judges in closing public courts should be addressed in the public interest? Will we see such professional interest the next time a Barbados judge closes a courtroom to the media and the public?
Or, is it as we suspect - that the fight to have an open and transparent Barbados justice system is only a media cause when journalists are before the courts?
The “professional” Barbados media has much to atone for with the Bajan public
11 Comments
RRRickyDecember 24, 2008 at 4:00 am
This is a powerful article BFP. The media does have much to atone for but they have been trapped by habits of subservience that were passed from generation to generation.
reality checkDecember 24, 2008 at 4:56 am
subservience and years of intimidation and fear exercised by those elected and unelected officials who should know better.
freedom and justice are a constant challenge for all citizens not a one time event for abused journalists.
Hasn’t the CJ reached retirement age? and hasn’t the DPP long since demonstrated he is unfit for the job?
anonDecember 24, 2008 at 5:11 am
BFP, Lord Nelson will get down off his stand and walk down Broad Street before the Bajan “journalists” do such again.
This is all self interest. Once this case goes away then it will be business as usual for Bajan “journalists.”
What is happening to these Bajan “journalists” has been happening to citizens of this country for years and the Bajan “journalists’ could not care less.
Serves them right!
Lazy bunch!
Ian BourneDecember 24, 2008 at 11:19 am
This item was very true - As I see it, both sides are guilty, the media for not ensuring Police are sticking to their duty by co-operating too often in hopes of a scoop; and Police having a double standard for videoing or photographing a suspect regardless of affiliation (cops used to call CBC say “COME NOW” to get footage of a suspect, I am sure it still happens - but this was one of their own)…
But Jimmy and Cherie are victims of circumstance each trying to score a buck as they are freelance and thus ensuring their livelihood and also obeying instructions.
Both sides need to adhere to their original tenets of their job, less complicated.
Lady AnonDecember 24, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Ironic, isn’t it?
Journalists won’t report on closed court hearings until it concerns one of their own…Police allow photographs of accused until it concerns one of their own.
What goes around comes around.
Barbados the BeautifulDecember 24, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Let’s hear why the judge wanted to close the court at first. Was it so that they could punish Cherie and Jimmy without anybody watching? Maybe to avoid the court and police being embarrassed by the charges which are not even real?
And if the press were allowed into the court when are we going to get a report about what happened? if we don’t then the press and court are squashing down freedom of the press and cozying up.
The press are supposed to be on our side reporting everything that happens in court every day not just what the court wants them to tell.
Best opportunity yet for the reporters to show what they are supposed to do.
Global Voices Online » Barbados: Journalists Appear in Court December 24, 2008 at 2:18 pm
[...] Barbados Free Press is keeping an eye on the case of the two arrested journalists, calling the open court hearing “a stunning victory by the dozens of local news media people who showed up to support”, while at the same time denouncing local mainstream media for not making an issue of closed court hearings before. Posted by Janine Mendes-Franco Print version Share This [...]
Knight of the Long KnivesDecember 24, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Interesting comments by Ian Bourne on the police calling jounalist to “come now”. It continues to impress me that he posts seemingly without fear of repercussions. I also know of cases where people have called the Nation to get their pictures removed from the court pages in some of those cases that are adjourned and never heard from again. Meanwhile the police continue to humiliate and harass ordinary taxpayers and so called journalist continue to look the other way on corruption at the highest levels.
Knight of the Long KnivesDecember 24, 2008 at 3:38 pm
…and before I forget Merry Christmas to all the posters and moderators. Lets hope for a corruption free 2009 so we don’t have so much to talk about (rabbits can dream…).
RohanDecember 24, 2008 at 11:09 pm
Ironic, isn’t it?
Journalists won’t report on closed court hearings until it concerns one of their own…Police allow photographs of accused until it concerns one of their own.
What goes around comes around.*******
Great point Lady Anon
De OriginalDecember 26, 2008 at 11:40 pm
I think we need let this case run it’s course before the courts. I still have hope in the system. I look forward to seeing this situation resolved in a just fashion. I am one Bajan who believe that the system still works. I think all the hype is another way of the journalists who as BFP so rightly said dont report fair and honest, to misrepresent the facts and blow this situation outta hand…..
Seasons Greetings to the Moderators and posters.

posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}

Friday, 26 December 2008

Apologies for sending a second email


From: I Am Three <bleedinghands@gmail.com>
To: jeyapalanmahesan@netscape.net
Sent: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 5:49 am
Subject: Apologies for sending a second email
































I Am Three Manchester, UK
Alternative / Accoustic / Rap
Members: Irving, Hughes




Hi

Apologies for sending a second email, but it apears i had thought it was called the wicked wild wild web, and added an extra w to the link, so here i needed to correct the error and send the link for our tour album again....here it is


i've also now uploaded the tracks to


which may be an easier option?

so feel free to download and enjoy!

thanks and happy christmas again!
=0 A
Andy and Irving



Click here to put our songs on your Facebook profile.


MUSIC









rawrip shop










Press Releases for I Am Three
"A TRIP into the world of I Am Three can be disorientating. Their songs, with their diverse tempo's, tim bre and poetry, usually leave listeners with more questions than answers, as the music revolves around a playful mix of fiction and reality." - MEN, Manchester Evening News (Nov 01, 2008)
"RECENTLY formed acoustic duo I Am Three brought the atmosphere of a smoky jazz club combined with alt-country blues to Night and Day, performing a low key gig last night. " - Amy Glendinning, City Life (Aug 22, 2008)




Physical inquires can be sent to: 501 Washington St. Suite J, Durham, NC, 27701, USA

If our email is in your Spam/Junk Folder, please http://www.reverbnation.com/controller/cms/view/JunkEmail