Power Of Numbers Prevails As Barbados Court Opens To The Public
On Monday, a Barbados judge changed an earlier decision to have a closed bail hearing for the two freelance journalists arrested last Saturday when they tried to take photographs of a police officer charged with dealing in cocaine. (See Nation stories: Journalists Show Support & Media Close Ranks)
Despite the fact that only “some” family and media colleagues were allowed into the court, this was a stunning victory by the dozens of local news media people who showed up to support freelancers Cherie Pitt and Jimmy Gittens. It just shows what can happen when a few determined people challenge the system and say “This is wrong.”
Barbados Courts Often Operate In Secret, Closed Hearings
It may surprise our foreign readership to learn that here on Barbados, people are often brought before the closed courts where what happens is kept from the public. Judges on this island will order their court closed on the flimsiest of excuses so charges can be processed, dropped or negotiated to resolutions that would disturb the citizens if they only knew.
Transcripts of proceddings are seldom available even to lawyers - let alone to the media or public. Many “hearings” happen in the judges’ chambers where deals are sometimes made to “quietly let things fade away.”
The Barbados news media has often been part of such coverups and it is not uncommon for stories to just drop off the news media radar at the same time that deals are done in closed courts. Nothing is ever said again and the media remains quiet.
But the news media were not willing to let that happen on Monday with two of their own being dragged before a “closed to the public” court. They pushed, used their numbers and their power and the judge soon decided that the “public interest” required an open process in an open court.
We Have Two Messages For Members of the “Professional” Barbados Media
1. Congratulations on pressuring the judge to have an open process in an open court.
2. Why hasn’t the media made an issue of closed court hearings before? Why only when two of your own are before the court? Has the “professional” Barbados journalism community now decided that this abuse by judges in closing public courts should be addressed in the public interest? Will we see such professional interest the next time a Barbados judge closes a courtroom to the media and the public?
Or, is it as we suspect - that the fight to have an open and transparent Barbados justice system is only a media cause when journalists are before the courts?
The “professional” Barbados media has much to atone for with the Bajan public
11 Comments
RRRickyDecember 24, 2008 at 4:00 am
This is a powerful article BFP. The media does have much to atone for but they have been trapped by habits of subservience that were passed from generation to generation.
reality checkDecember 24, 2008 at 4:56 am
subservience and years of intimidation and fear exercised by those elected and unelected officials who should know better.
freedom and justice are a constant challenge for all citizens not a one time event for abused journalists.
Hasn’t the CJ reached retirement age? and hasn’t the DPP long since demonstrated he is unfit for the job?
anonDecember 24, 2008 at 5:11 am
BFP, Lord Nelson will get down off his stand and walk down Broad Street before the Bajan “journalists” do such again.
This is all self interest. Once this case goes away then it will be business as usual for Bajan “journalists.”
What is happening to these Bajan “journalists” has been happening to citizens of this country for years and the Bajan “journalists’ could not care less.
Serves them right!
Lazy bunch!
Ian BourneDecember 24, 2008 at 11:19 am
This item was very true - As I see it, both sides are guilty, the media for not ensuring Police are sticking to their duty by co-operating too often in hopes of a scoop; and Police having a double standard for videoing or photographing a suspect regardless of affiliation (cops used to call CBC say “COME NOW” to get footage of a suspect, I am sure it still happens - but this was one of their own)…
But Jimmy and Cherie are victims of circumstance each trying to score a buck as they are freelance and thus ensuring their livelihood and also obeying instructions.
Both sides need to adhere to their original tenets of their job, less complicated.
Lady AnonDecember 24, 2008 at 12:30 pm
Ironic, isn’t it?
Journalists won’t report on closed court hearings until it concerns one of their own…Police allow photographs of accused until it concerns one of their own.
What goes around comes around.
Barbados the BeautifulDecember 24, 2008 at 12:35 pm
Let’s hear why the judge wanted to close the court at first. Was it so that they could punish Cherie and Jimmy without anybody watching? Maybe to avoid the court and police being embarrassed by the charges which are not even real?
And if the press were allowed into the court when are we going to get a report about what happened? if we don’t then the press and court are squashing down freedom of the press and cozying up.
The press are supposed to be on our side reporting everything that happens in court every day not just what the court wants them to tell.
Best opportunity yet for the reporters to show what they are supposed to do.
Global Voices Online » Barbados: Journalists Appear in Court December 24, 2008 at 2:18 pm
[...] Barbados Free Press is keeping an eye on the case of the two arrested journalists, calling the open court hearing “a stunning victory by the dozens of local news media people who showed up to support”, while at the same time denouncing local mainstream media for not making an issue of closed court hearings before. Posted by Janine Mendes-Franco Print version Share This [...]
Knight of the Long KnivesDecember 24, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Interesting comments by Ian Bourne on the police calling jounalist to “come now”. It continues to impress me that he posts seemingly without fear of repercussions. I also know of cases where people have called the Nation to get their pictures removed from the court pages in some of those cases that are adjourned and never heard from again. Meanwhile the police continue to humiliate and harass ordinary taxpayers and so called journalist continue to look the other way on corruption at the highest levels.
Knight of the Long KnivesDecember 24, 2008 at 3:38 pm
…and before I forget Merry Christmas to all the posters and moderators. Lets hope for a corruption free 2009 so we don’t have so much to talk about (rabbits can dream…).
RohanDecember 24, 2008 at 11:09 pm
Ironic, isn’t it?
Journalists won’t report on closed court hearings until it concerns one of their own…Police allow photographs of accused until it concerns one of their own.
What goes around comes around.*******
Great point Lady Anon
De OriginalDecember 26, 2008 at 11:40 pm
I think we need let this case run it’s course before the courts. I still have hope in the system. I look forward to seeing this situation resolved in a just fashion. I am one Bajan who believe that the system still works. I think all the hype is another way of the journalists who as BFP so rightly said dont report fair and honest, to misrepresent the facts and blow this situation outta hand…..
Seasons Greetings to the Moderators and posters.
posted by Jeyapalan.T.S.Mahesan {jeyapalantsmahesan.blogspot.com}
















